So with the recent ACN forum activity, I thought I might take a peek a various ACN reviews across the Internet, and I don't think things look all that great. The sad thing is, somehow, if I didn't know any better, and I looked at the package, the company's appearance, and what they claim to provide, I'd have thought they looked like a really great company. Hell I even like the logo presentation. American Communications Network Inc. is basically a telecommunications company that provides, well, telecommunications. They are stationed in North Carolina where they provide telephone service, high speed Internet, video phone and evidently home security. The company was founded by Greg Provenzano, Mike Cupisz, Robert Stevanovski, and Tony Cupisz. Anyone familiar with these guys can basically tell they have got some collateral, so its hard for me to really understand what the cause is for the common and ever increasing angry ACN review. What I mean is, some of the complaints are so numerous that there just HAS to be truth to them.
If you still cant see what I'm getting at, consider Bill Gates and Microsoft. Say what you want about Vista, it was definitely a pain in the ass, but what if it was far worse than it was? What if it didn't do half of what it claimed? You'd be dumb founded as to why one of the richest individuals in the world would have his company produce a terrible product, and not care, then give you a real hard time trying to get a refund, or outright deny you. Well, ACN is no Microsoft, nor are the founders in the same world as Bill Gates, but the formula is the same. Why did ACN turn out to piss so many people off and appear kind of sucky? Before I get into all the sucky things floating around the Internet, I want to point out that they have an A rating with the BBB, and although that doesn't always mean everything, it certainly means something. They're also a member of the Direct Sellers Association, and that group does have some noteworthy standards. The other thing is, they do seem to be staying afloat, though I'm not certain how well its doing, it says alot in an the mlm industry.
Now to be honest, if you can't already tell, I'm not really qualified to rate a comp plan, I haven't participated in any mlms, let alone enough to compare more than one, but I can say in a review whether or not I would. New ACN representatives are awarded with two starter levels; Customer Representative and Team Trainer. There are also three earned levels; An Executive Team Trainer, A Team Coordinator, and a Regional Vice President. You pay a one-time training and application fee of 99 bucks, but if you want the Team Trainer package, I hope you have the $499 they want for it. Like other mlm comp plans they have a point system and a title hierarchy, like if you want to be an Executive Team Trainer, you need to yield 20 personal billing customers while having also directly sponsored and qualified three Team Trainers. That means helping each of them acquire six long distance customers or eight customers using any ACN service within the specified time.
Probably sounds easy, but one of the biggest complaints that pops up on the Internet is that you bust your ass juggling all these deals, taking calls, attending meetings, and keeping busier than McDonald's employee, only that employee makes more money and makes it more consistently. Obviously its not fair to judge that based on only the negative, but it seems like all the positive reviews only come from articles written by highly biased individuals. Another issue is the quality of their products, starting with the ACN video phone. The point has been made over and over again; who uses a video phone other than another ACN rep? What's wrong with the phone you already have and pay some hefty fees for? To add to the already irritable state of ACN reviews, the phone is said to have horrible picture, and an equally horrible connection quality, then finally to top it all off, if you leave or cancel, you're stuck with the phone, and it won't work without their service, which you need to be a member to "enjoy". See the issue?
Another complaint is that some ACN reps (not all of them obviously) have all but stalked and harrassed some people in an attempt at getting them involved with the company. Now in mentioning this, I'm merely pointing out that something is off somewhere. That kind of behaviour is likely not suggested by ACN, but is there maybe a lack of compensation, a dealine, something in particular that makes some of them go that far? Is it just bad luck that ACN managed to hire a portion of the world's sales psychos? It's tough to say, but if the work vs payout is as bad as many people say, maybe that's the problem. Though, it must be said that a sane person would leave the company before resorting to those kinds of tactics.
Finally, there is the management. What is the biggest most important part of a company's structure when it comes to decision making, planning and direction? The guys in charge right? If the guys in charge could care less to run a competent customer service that actually returns your calls, and doesn't refund you your money for a useless phone, what does that really say? I think the concept of what they offer is great, business all over the world may understand their products, their goals and the market in which they're entering, but what if they have no idea how to set up their technical business network, with office lines, customer service etc. Who would you hire? ACN if only they were awesome. Ultimately, I really don't know where ACN stands, if there were only a few complaints covering these categories, I might not have thought much about them, but there are quite a few, and I find it even more puzzling since as far as I can tell, the founders aren't known cons.